Fighting brand rip-off
Fighting brand rip-off
This blog is based on the article ‘fighting brand rip-off. It is incredibly hard to protect intellectual property in certain parts of the world. China, where foreign direct investment flows in apparently has very weak laws protecting intellectual property.
New balance have had set back because of outsourcing their products to subcontractors, overseas in China, which is the major interest in the analysis of the article with Barron’s frame work.
According to me intellectual property has always been a non-market issue which does not get much attention in some countries.
Issues- The issue according too the article is based on intellectual property rights in China, which is based on a case started in 1999 between Boston based company wanted to terminate the sub contract with Horace chang because of unauthorized production of New balance shoes. New balance was not able to terminate the contract inspite of illegal practices by the sub contractors, apparently Chinese government have always been supporting the local company Horace chang.
Moreover, the products that were produced illegally were exported to countries like Taiwan, Honking, Italy, and Germany. Etc.
Another alarming issues was that New balance was approached by the jury in the province of high court in Guandong, asked for 300000 $ to have a verdict on the case. The price eventually went down to 100000 and then to 50000 $. This is a major issue that will question the credibility of Chinese jurisdiction.
Interest: The interest groups regarding the issue would be new balance, Horace change and other companies that have outsourced its work to subcontractors in china and have been facing brand rip-offs.
Institution : Another non-market element that would be concerned about these acts would be governtment of china. Since China have been booming because of foreign direct investment these unstable and corrupted laws and judiciary system would pose a major threat. Another entity without financial interest would be the Shenzhen court that was involved in this issue because the case was first filed in this court.
Information: Since the case has been running since 1999, new balance rip-off case has gained enough publicity through media. The case have been published in www.fortune.com with more details, newspapers etc.
This blog is based on the article ‘fighting brand rip-off. It is incredibly hard to protect intellectual property in certain parts of the world. China, where foreign direct investment flows in apparently has very weak laws protecting intellectual property.
New balance have had set back because of outsourcing their products to subcontractors, overseas in China, which is the major interest in the analysis of the article with Barron’s frame work.
According to me intellectual property has always been a non-market issue which does not get much attention in some countries.
Issues- The issue according too the article is based on intellectual property rights in China, which is based on a case started in 1999 between Boston based company wanted to terminate the sub contract with Horace chang because of unauthorized production of New balance shoes. New balance was not able to terminate the contract inspite of illegal practices by the sub contractors, apparently Chinese government have always been supporting the local company Horace chang.
Moreover, the products that were produced illegally were exported to countries like Taiwan, Honking, Italy, and Germany. Etc.
Another alarming issues was that New balance was approached by the jury in the province of high court in Guandong, asked for 300000 $ to have a verdict on the case. The price eventually went down to 100000 and then to 50000 $. This is a major issue that will question the credibility of Chinese jurisdiction.
Interest: The interest groups regarding the issue would be new balance, Horace change and other companies that have outsourced its work to subcontractors in china and have been facing brand rip-offs.
Institution : Another non-market element that would be concerned about these acts would be governtment of china. Since China have been booming because of foreign direct investment these unstable and corrupted laws and judiciary system would pose a major threat. Another entity without financial interest would be the Shenzhen court that was involved in this issue because the case was first filed in this court.
Information: Since the case has been running since 1999, new balance rip-off case has gained enough publicity through media. The case have been published in www.fortune.com with more details, newspapers etc.

